AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares the effectiveness of two treatment methods for type II pediatric phalangeal neck fractures: closed reduction and cast immobilization (CRCI) versus closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), using a meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes.
  • Patients were grouped based on treatment type and assessed on various measurements, including radiographic outcomes and hand function, with statistical analysis to confirm the results.
  • While both treatment methods showed significant improvement from preoperative states, conservatively treated patients had better total active range of motion, and the complication rates varied, highlighting that CRCI mainly faced imaging-related issues compared to functional complications in CRPP.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of type II pediatric phalangeal neck fractures (PPNFs) treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization (CRCI) versus closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), and evaluated the clinical efficacy of conservative versus surgical treatment of type II PPNFs via meta-analysis.

Methods: Patients aged ≤ 14 years with type II PPNFs were divided into conservative (CRCI) and operative (CRPP) groups. Radiographs measured angulation and translation; hand function was assessed with total active range of motion (TAM) and Quick-DASH. Complication rates were also compared between the groups. A meta-analysis of conservative versus operative treatment confirmed the clinical results. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and R studio 3.0 with two-tailed, chi-squared, and Mann-Whitney U or t-tests, P < 0.05. Meta-analysis used fixed or random effects models, calculating mean differences and odds ratios for outcomes, and assessing heterogeneity with I and Q tests.

Results: Final angulation (3.4° ± 3.7° and 4.9° ± 5.4° vs. 3.6° ± 3.7° and 4.2° ± 4.3°) and displacement (6.3% ± 5.8% and 5.7% ± 4.7% vs. 5.8% ± 5.5% and 3.2% ± 4.2%) in the coronal and sagittal planes were not different statistically between the conservative and surgical groups (P > 0.05), but improved significantly compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). Although Quick-DASH scores were comparable in both groups (P = 0.105), conservatively treated patients had a significantly better TAM at the last follow-up visit (P = 0.005). The complication rates were 24.2% and 41.7% in the surgical and conservatively treated groups respectively (P = 0.162). However, the latter primarily experienced imaging-related complications, whereas the former experienced functional complications (P = 0.046). Our meta-analysis (n = 181 patients) also showed comparable functional (P = 0.49) and radiographic (P = 0.59) outcomes and complication rates (P = 0.21) between the surgical (94 patients) and conservative (87 patients) groups.

Conclusions: Conservative and surgical treatments are both reliable and safe approaches for managing type II PPNF in children. However, conservatively treated patients generally experience similar radiographic outcomes, lower complication rates, and better functional outcomes than surgically treated ones.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06133-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phalangeal neck
8
neck fractures
8
closed reduction
8
conservative versus
8
type ppnfs
8
cast versus
4
versus kirschner
4
kirschner wire
4
wire fixation
4
type
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!