Assessment of lower limb alignment: supine weight-bearing CT scanograms compared with a standing full-length radiograph.

Purpose: We identified limb misalignment by applying personalized axial force while the limb was in a supine position to mimic a standing posture. This study aimed to confirm the accuracy of evaluating lower limb alignment using supine weight-bearing CT scanograms.

Methods: We prospectively compared measurements of the weight-bearing line ratio (WBL), hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and joint convergence angle (JLCA) in 46 sets of supine weight-bearing CT scanograms with those obtained from full-length standing anteroposterior lower extremity radiographs. We achieved the weight-bearing CT scanograms by applying six different levels of axial force: zero, 1/5 of body weight, 2/5 of body weight, 3/5 of body weight, 4/5 of body weight, and full body weight. We assessed the impact of age, body mass index, HKA, and JLCA on the observed mechanical axis deviation differences between the two methods.

Result: The average absolute difference between standing radiographs and supine CT scanograms was 4.32% for the WBL ratio (p < 0.05), 1.25° for HKA (p < 0.05), and 0.46 for JLCA (p < 0.05). The mean absolute difference was minimal when applying full body weight axial pressure during CT scanograms (p > 0.05). Age, body mass index, HKA, and JLCA had no effect on the deviation in the mechanical axis measurements obtained through supine weight-bearing CT scanograms with full body weight.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found in assessing lower limb alignment between standing radiographs and supine weight-bearing CT scanograms with full body weight. Weight-bearing CT scanograms prove to be a valuable method for assessing lower limb alignment while in a supine position.