Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction.

Methods: A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables.

Results: The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction.

Conclusion: Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03900-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

augmentation mastopexy
24
augmentation
10
long-term satisfaction
8
satisfaction breast
8
breast augmentation
8
augmentation augmentation
8
patient satisfaction
8
lower satisfaction
8
satisfaction
7
mastopexy
6

Similar Publications

Versatility of Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery.

Aesthetic Plast Surg

December 2024

Plastic Surgeon, Private Practice, Academia de Cirurgia Plàstica, Oporto, Portugal.

Background: Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction with implants are among the most performed surgery worldwide.

Objective: In the search for an ideal implant in terms of safety, shape and consistency, the authors report their experience with a subtype of breast implant, the Diagon\Gel 4Two implants, in both cosmetic and reconstructive cases by analyzing their experience on 116 consecutive patients.

Methods: One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients undergoing both aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ptotic breast deformity arises from decreased breast tissue volume and skin laxity, causing descent of breast tissue due to gravity. Mastopexy lifts and reshapes the breast and can be potentially associated with breast implants in case of need of volume increase. However, this option is not accepted by all the patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The increasing demand for correcting ptosis has made mastopexy one of the most common procedures in plastic surgery. While various techniques have been developed, clinical outcomes often require refinement. In this study, we employed an inferolaterally pedicled, tongue-shaped parenchymal flap to perform auto-augmentation mastopexy via periareolar approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Breast and chest asymmetries are extremely common, and primary augmentation mammoplasty can be challenging in these cases. However, there is a paucity of information on the relative distribution of these asymmetries and the implant sizes used in these patients.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive cases of primary augmentation mammoplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 1999 to May 2012 was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!