A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Estimating Body Weight From Measurements From Different Single-Slice Computed Tomography Levels: An Evaluation of Total Cross-Sectional Body Area Measurements and Deep Learning. | LitMetric

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the estimated body weight obtained from 2 easy-to-perform methods and the actual body weight at different computed tomography (CT) levels and determine the best reference site for estimating body weight.

Methods: A total of 862 patients from a public database of whole-body positron emission tomography/CT studies were retrospectively analyzed. Two methods for estimating body weight at 10 single-slice CT levels were evaluated: a linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area and a deep learning-based model. The accuracy of body weight estimation was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman rank correlation coefficient ( ρ ).

Results: In the linear regression models, the estimated body weight at the T5 level correlated best with the actual body weight (MAE, 5.39 kg; RMSE, 7.01 kg; ρ = 0.912). The deep learning-based models showed the best accuracy at the L5 level (MAE, 6.72 kg; RMSE, 8.82 kg; ρ = 0.865).

Conclusions: Although both methods were feasible for estimating body weight at different single-slice CT levels, the linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area at the T5 level as an input variable was the most favorable method for single-slice CT analysis for estimating body weight.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001587DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body weight
36
estimating body
20
total cross-sectional
12
body
12
cross-sectional body
12
body area
12
linear regression
12
weight
9
computed tomography
8
tomography levels
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!