Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: The study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bone volume, density, and crestal bone levels in conventionally placed dental implants with and without local application of 1% metformin (MF) gel using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 9 months.
Materials And Methods: Twenty implants were placed in 18 individuals, randomly divided into 2 groups where Group A received a local application of 1% MF gel along with implant placement. In contrast, Group B received implant placement alone. After thorough clinical examination and preoperative CBCTs, implants were placed under aseptic conditions. Patients were recalled at 3 and 9 months after surgery. Implants were functionally loaded by the end of 3 month. Soft-tissue parameters such as modified plaque index and modified sulcular bleeding index were recorded along with CBCT evaluation to assess the crestal bone loss, bone density measurement, and bone volume, postoperatively. Fisher's extract test, independent and paired -test, and Bonferroni analysis were used to determine statistical significance with ≤ 0.05.
Results: There was no discernible difference between the groups regarding soft-tissue parameters, bone density, and crestal bone levels. However, comparing bone volume between the test and control groups at 9 months was statistically significant. The test group with 1% MF gel showed increased bone volume around the implant.
Conclusion: The data obtained were strong enough to suggest that 1% MF gel administered locally can increase peri-implant bone volume, possibly due to its additional property favoring osteoblastic stimulation and proliferation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906785 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_534_22 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!