Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study aimed to explore the non-volatile metabolomic variability of a large panel of strains (44) belonging to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum species in the context of the wine alcoholic fermentation. For the S. cerevisiae strains flor, fruit and wine strains isolated from different anthropic niches were compared. This phenotypic survey was achieved with a special focus on acidity management by using natural grape juices showing opposite level of acidity. A H NMR based metabolomics approach was developed for quantifying fifteen wine metabolites that showed important quantitative variability within the strains. Thanks to the robustness of the assay and the low amount of sample required, this tool is relevant for the analysis of the metabolomic profile of numerous wines. The S. cerevisiae and S. uvarum species displayed significant differences for malic, succinic, and pyruvic acids, as well as for glycerol and 2,3-butanediol production. As expected, S. uvarum showed weaker fermentation fitness but interesting acidifying properties. The three groups of S. cerevisiae strains showed different metabolic profiles mostly related to their production and consumption of organic acids. More specifically, flor yeast consumed more malic acid and produced more acetic acid than the other S. cerevisiae strains which was never reported before. These features might be linked to the ability of flor yeasts to shift their metabolism during wine oxidation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2024.104463 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!