The current study investigated the association of children's age, gender, ethnicity, Big Five personality traits, and self-efficacy with their academic cheating behaviors. Academic cheating is a rampant problem that has been documented in adolescents and adults for nearly a century, but our understanding of the early development and factors influencing academic cheating is still weak. Using Zoom, the current study recruited children aged 4 to 12 years (N = 388), measured their cheating behaviors through six tasks simulating academic testing scenarios, and assessed their Big Five personality traits and self-efficacy through a modified Berkeley Puppet Interview paradigm, as well as age and gender. We found that children cheated significantly less with increased age and that boys cheated significantly more than girls. However, neither Big Five personality traits nor self-efficacy were significantly correlated with children's cheating. These findings suggest that academic cheating is a developing issue from early to middle childhood and that factors such as gender socialization may play a role in such development. Personal characteristics such as personality traits and self-efficacy may undergo additional development before their associations with cheating become robust, as reported in the adult literature.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105888 | DOI Listing |
Front Artif Intell
November 2024
Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, China.
Generative AI models, including ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, are increasingly significant in enhancing K-12 education, offering support across various disciplines. These models provide sample answers for humanities prompts, solve mathematical equations, and brainstorm novel ideas. Despite their educational value, ethical concerns have emerged regarding their potential to mislead students into copying answers directly from AI when completing assignments, assessments, or research papers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStud Health Technol Inform
November 2024
Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills, Norway.
This study explores the proposition of requiring students to hand in universally designed coursework and the transferrable benefits of accessibility audits. Coursework that adheres to universal design (UD) principles will be more accessible to fellow students and teachers. In this study we investigate if the universal design perspective can have positive side effects as a vessel for plagiarism detection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFData Brief
December 2024
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 252 Bloor Street West, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada.
The present data were reported in the article "Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests" (Wilson et al., 2024). It reports the findings from an online study to assess children's cheating behaviors on simulated academic tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
November 2024
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, California State University, Fresno, Fresno, United States.
College athletes balance academic and athletic roles and, as a result, can hold different combinations of academic and athletic identities. The purpose of this study was to identify common identity profiles in a large sample of Division I (elite) college athletes in the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Teach
February 2025
GKT School of Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the shift to remote learning, heightening scrutiny of open-book examinations (OBEs) versus closed-book examinations (CBEs) within science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEM) education. This study evaluates the efficacy of OBEs compared to CBEs on student performance and perceptions within STEM subjects, considering the emerging influence of sophisticated large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.
Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review analysed peer-reviewed articles published from 2013, focusing on the impact of OBEs and CBEs on university STEM students.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!