A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_session5pdqoj64gclgn0tcgq4aeb5a1j1h37ek): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of European and American Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: How Are They different? | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the 2023 management guidelines for UTUC from the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association/Society of Urologic Oncology (AUA/SUO), finding both substantial agreement and important differences in their recommendations.
  • The authors emphasize the need for ongoing collaboration and alignment of guidelines to enhance UTUC management globally, calling for future research to address inconsistencies and improve treatment outcomes.

Article Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) affecting the urinary tract is recognized as one of the prevalent types of cancer, ranking fifth in terms of incidence. However, it is important to note that upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), in comparison to bladder cancer, is relatively uncommon and represents a minority of UC cases, accounting for ∼5% to 10%. It is worth emphasizing that as much as 60% of UTUC cases are invasive at the time of diagnosis, in contrast to 25% of bladder cancer cases. These statistics highlight the urgent need for well-designed, multidisciplinary strategies to guide optimal management for this vulnerable patient population, aiming to control treatment variability and minimize the risks associated with undertreatment and overtreatment. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the contemporary guidelines on UTUC management from the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association/Society of Urologic Oncology (AUA/SUO) released in 2023. Our objective is to contrast the different guidelines and examine the evidence on which their recommendations are based. By thoroughly reviewing the guidelines from both organizations, we observed substantial agreement on the management of UTUC. However, we also identified noticeable differences among these guidelines, leading to a wide range of recommendations. These disparities might stem from variations in clinical practices, regional preferences, and the availability of resources. It is crucial to acknowledge that both the EAU and AUA/SUO base their guidelines on the latest scientific evidence and expert consensus within their respective regions. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing collaboration, knowledge exchange, and harmonization of guidelines to improve the standard of care for UTUC globally. Future research should focus on identifying areas of consensus and bridging the gaps between different international guidelines to enhance the management outcomes for this challenging disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0476DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

urothelial carcinoma
12
guidelines
8
upper tract
8
tract urothelial
8
bladder cancer
8
utuc
5
comparison european
4
european american
4
american guidelines
4
guidelines upper
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens compared with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Method: A comprehensive search was performed in four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens for advanced or metastatic UC. The search encompassed the time span from the inception of the databases to April 23, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Real-world Effectiveness of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Clin Genitourin Cancer

December 2024

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address:

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a nectin-4-directed antibody and microtubule inhibitor conjugate indicated for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitors or are ineligible for cisplatin-containing regimens and have undergone at least 1 prior line of therapy. EV is also indicated in combination with pembrolizumab in the first-line setting. However, real-world effectiveness of EV based on treatment line and impact of prior therapy remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Utilization of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent, and optimal patient selection for NAT is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NAT in high grade UTUC undergoing RNU.

Materials And Methods: The UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN) identified patients who underwent RNU for high grade UTUC between 2000 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) with early papillary formation is terminology sometimes used to suggest incipient high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC) but may lead to confusion between true CIS and lateral flat spread of PUC.

Methods: It remains unclear how pathologists and urologists interpret this scenario, so a survey was circulated to 68 pathologists (group 1 = 28 academic genitourinary pathologists; group 2 = 17 pathologists with a self-reported genitourinary focus; group 3 = 23 pathologists self-reported as not genitourinary specialists) and 32 urologists.

Results: Regarding atypical urothelial lesions that appear mainly flat but contain possible papillae, group 3 was more likely to label this as CIS compared with groups 1 and 2 (35% for group 3 vs 13% for groups 1 and 2), while groups 1 and 2 more often adopted another descriptive diagnosis, such as "CIS with early papillary features" (38% for groups 1 and 2 vs 13% for group 3).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic significance of a novel marker, the red cell distribution width to lymphocyte percentage (RDW-to-LYM%) ratio, in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The clinical and follow-up data of 625 patients with UTUC receiving RNU were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off value of the pre-treatment RDW-to-LYM% ratio was determined as 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!