AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) impacts the quality and analysis of lung nodules through ultra-low dose CT scans.
  • It involved 56 patients analyzed with both standard-dose and ultra-low-dose CT, comparing different reconstruction methods using CAD software to measure various nodule characteristics.
  • Results showed that DLIR-H improved image quality significantly over the standard method while maintaining comparable nodule detection and characterization, with ultra-low dose CT using DLIR-H reducing radiation exposure drastically.

Article Abstract

Rationale And Objective: To investigate the influence of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the image quality and quantitative analysis of pulmonary nodules under ultra-low dose lung CT conditions.

Materials And Methods: This was a prospective study with patient consent and included 56 patients with suspected pulmonary nodules. Patients were examined by both standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V 40% (ASIR-V40%) (group A), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using ASIR-V40% (group B) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) (group C). The three image sets were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as nodule length, width, density, volume, risk, and classification were measured. The CAD quantitative data of different nodule types (solid, calcified, and subsolid nodules) and nodule image quality scores evaluated by two physicians on a 5-point scale were compared.

Result: The radiation dose in ULDCT was 0.25 ± 0.08mSv, 7.2% that of the 3.48 ± 1.08mSv in SDCT (P < 0.001). 104 pulmonary nodules were detected (51/53 solid, 26/24 calcified and 27/27 subsolid in Groups A and (B&C), respectively). Group B had lower density for solid, calcified nodules, and lower volume and risk for subsolid nodules than Group A, while Group C had lower density for calcified nodules (P < 0.05), There were no significant differences in other parameters among the three groups (P > 0.05). Group A and C had similar image quality for nodules and were higher than Group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: DLIR-H significantly improves image quality than ASIR-V40% and maintains similar nodule detection and characterization with CAD in ULDCT compared to SDCT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
12
deep learning
8
learning image
8
image reconstruction
8
pulmonary nodules
8
images reconstructed
8
asir-v40% group
8
image
5
improving image
4
nodule
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!