LSG vs OAGB: 7-Year Follow-up Data of a Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Outcome Based on BAROS Score.

Obes Surg

Department of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery, ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, 700064, West Bengal, India.

Published: April 2024

Background: This study aims to evaluate and compare long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) based on bariatric analysis reporting and outcome system (BAROS) score.

Materials And Methods: Patients operated for morbid obesity between 2013 and 2015 were randomised to LSG and OAGB groups. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 201 patients (100 LSG and 101 OAGB) were analysed for changes in total body weight (TBW), body mass index (BMI), percent excess weight loss (%EWL), percent total weight loss (%TWL), QoL (quality of life) scores, comorbidity resolution and outcome based on BAROS at 7 years.

Results: Sixty-six LSG and 64 OAGB patients were followed up at 7 years. Mean pre-operative TBW and BMI were 119 ± 28.2 and 44.87 ± 7.71 for LSG group and 113.25 ± 23.74 and 44.71 ± 8.75 for OAGB group respectively. At 7 years after surgery, there was significant drop in mean TBW and BMI in both groups. Mean %EWL for LSG and OAGB patients was 50.78 ± 28.48 and 59.99 ± 23.32 and mean %TWL for LSG and OAGB patients was 23.22 ± 12.66 and 27.71 ± 12.27 respectively. Mean QoL scores at 7 years were significantly higher than the pre-operative scores and most of the patients in both groups had remission or improvement in their comorbidities. 68.76% OAGB patients had very good or excellent outcome on BAROS score while only 36.37% LSG patients had similar outcome.

Conclusions: LSG and OAGB are successful bariatric procedures over the long term. OAGB outperforms LSG and has significantly higher %EWL and %TWL over the long term.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07114-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lsg oagb
24
oagb patients
16
lsg
11
oagb
10
outcome based
8
based baros
8
baros score
8
patients
8
weight loss
8
tbw bmi
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare how well calcium citrate and calcium carbonate are absorbed after different weight loss surgeries: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and one-anastomosis gastric bypass.
  • It involved 150 participants, focusing on measuring calcium levels in blood and urine, as well as parathyroid hormone levels, over a controlled testing period.
  • Results showed that calcium citrate resulted in lower parathyroid hormone levels and better calcium absorption than calcium carbonate, indicating it may be the more effective supplement post-surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.

Obes Surg

September 2024

Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Director of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The study highlights the increasing importance of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in addressing global obesity, emphasizing the need for rigorous academic and fellowship training for surgeons.
  • A Modified Delphi method involving 89 surgeons from 42 countries was used to establish expert consensus on the necessary criteria for surgeons to obtain privileges for performing MBS, reaching agreement on 29 out of 30 statements.
  • Key consensus points include the requirement for surgeons to hold a general surgery degree, complete a dedicated fellowship, and adhere to defined learning curves for various MBS procedures, alongside maintaining patient data and collaborating in a multidisciplinary team.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Metabolic and Bariatric surgery (MBS) leads to significant weight loss and improvements in obesity-related comorbidities. However, the impact of MBS on Apolipoprotein B100 (Apo-B100) regulation is unclear. Apo-B100 is essential for the assembly and secretion of serum lipoprotein particles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide, whereas one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most performed procedure. Both procedures have reported good weight loss (WL) and low complications. However, should both have differences in the durability of WL and malnutrition?

Methods: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 300 patients was conducted to compare the outcomes of LSG and OAGB over a 5-year follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Updates Surg

October 2024

Department of General, Oncological and Bariatric Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Orłowski Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.

The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term weight loss outcomes and complications of revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) following failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A total of 586 patients underwent LSG from January 2010 to February 2018. Revisional OAGB (rOAGB) was performed in 22 (3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!