AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the online content of breast imaging fellowship programs (BIFPs) to assess how informative their websites are for applicants.
  • A total of 79 BIFP websites were analyzed, revealing a mean comprehensiveness score of only 44.1%, with many important criteria missing from over half of the sites.
  • The findings suggest that both fellowship programs and applicants would benefit from enhanced online information, as many applicants struggle to find essential details regarding the programs.

Article Abstract

Objective: The content of websites for fellowship programs is an important source of information for residents applying to breast imaging fellowship programs (BIFPs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comprehensiveness of online content of BIFPs.

Methods: A list of BIFPs was obtained from the Society of Breast Imaging website. Each program's website was evaluated for the presence of 19 training-relevant content variables. Impact of program characteristics on comprehensiveness scores was determined. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in comprehensiveness scores based upon region, and two-tailed t-tests were used to compare based upon program size.

Results: A total of 79 BIFP websites were analyzed. The mean comprehensiveness score of BIFP websites based on meeting the 19 criteria was 44.1% (8.4 ± 2.7/19). Program coordinator contact information (72/79, 91.1%), application requirements (71/79, 89.9%), and faculty information (56/79, 70.9%) appeared on >70% of websites. The majority of fellowships had a dedicated webpage for their program (71/79, 89.9%). Information regarding 12 of the 19 criteria appeared on fewer than 50% of websites. Program region (P = 0.32) and size (P = 0.16) were not associated with any differences in mean comprehensiveness score. Additionally, there was no significant difference in scores associated with filling all available positions for the 2020 match cycle (P = 0.77).

Conclusion: There is a paucity of information commonly sought out by applicants on the websites of most BIFPs. Both programs and applicants may mutually benefit from increasing comprehensive online content.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaa097DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online content
12
fellowship programs
8
breast imaging
8
comprehensiveness scores
8
differences comprehensiveness
8
bifp websites
8
comprehensiveness score
8
71/79 899%
8
comprehensiveness
6
websites
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!