AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how well an automatic breast volume scanner (ABVS) and various clinical and serological data can predict HER2 status in breast cancer patients, with a focus on combining these data sources for better accuracy.
  • Researchers included 271 patients with invasive breast cancer, creating training, validation, and test sets to evaluate different predictive models based on ABVS radiomics features and clinical information.
  • The weighted combination model outperformed single data source models in predicting HER2 status, achieving higher accuracy metrics, particularly in the validation set where it had the best area under the curve (AUC) of 0.826, indicating improved predictive performance.

Article Abstract

The aim to investigate the predictive efficacy of automatic breast volume scanner (ABVS), clinical and serological features alone or in combination at model level for predicting HER2 status. The model weighted combination method was developed to identify HER2 status compared with single data source model method and feature combination method. 271 patients with invasive breast cancer were included in the retrospective study, of which 174 patients in our center were randomized into the training and validation sets, and 97 patients in the external center were as the test set. Radiomics features extracted from the ABVS-based tumor, peritumoral 3 mm region, and peritumoral 5 mm region and clinical features were used to construct the four types of the optimal single data source models, Tumor, R3mm, R5mm, and Clinical model, respectively. Then, the model weighted combination and feature combination methods were performed to optimize the combination models. The proposed weighted combination models in predicting HER2 status achieved better performance both in validation set and test set. For the validation set, the single data source model, the feature combination model, and the weighted combination model achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660-947), 0.739 (CI 0.556,0.921), and 0.826 (95% CI 0.689,0.962), respectively; with the sensitivity and specificity were 100%, 62.5%; 81.8%, 66.7%; 90.9%,75.0%; respectively. For the test set, the single data source model, the feature combination model, and the weighted combination model attained the best AUC of 0.695 (95% CI 0.583, 0.807), 0.668 (95% CI 0.555,0.782), and 0.700 (95% CI 0.590,0.811), respectively; with the sensitivity and specificity were 86.1%, 41.9%; 61.1%, 71.0%; 86.1%, 41.9%; respectively. The model weighted combination was a better method to construct a combination model. The optimized weighted combination models composed of ABVS-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features and clinical features may be potential biomarkers for the noninvasive and preoperative prediction of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904744PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55838-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weighted combination
28
combination model
24
her2 status
20
model weighted
20
single data
16
data source
16
feature combination
16
model
14
combination
14
radiomics features
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!