AI Article Synopsis

  • A study compared the effectiveness of pembrolizumab and avelumab, two immune checkpoint inhibitors, in treating patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who had previously undergone chemotherapy.
  • Researchers examined patient records from January 2018 to February 2023, focusing on progression-free survival, overall survival, and immune-related adverse events.
  • Results indicated no significant differences in survival outcomes between the two treatments, but pembrolizumab showed a potential risk for higher endocrine-related adverse effects compared to avelumab.

Article Abstract

Background/aim: Sequential therapy using chemotherapy and subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment prolongs the survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, no comparison data for oncological outcome between pembrolizumab and avelumab has been reported. Thus, we compared oncological outcomes between pembrolizumab as second-line therapy and maintenance avelumab therapy in patients with advanced UC.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab or avelumab between January 2018 and February 2023. We compared oncological outcomes after adjusting for patient characteristics. Immune-related adverse events (AEs) in each group were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Results: There were 186 and 44 patients in the pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, 43 patients from each group were selected and analyzed. Median progression-free survival from the initiation of pembrolizumab and avelumab treatments was 126 and 139 days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.625). Median overall survival in the pembrolizumab and avelumab cohorts were 658 days and not reached, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.249). Thirty-eight (20.4%) and 14 (31.8%) all-grade immune-related AEs were observed in 186 pembrolizumab- and 44 avelumab-treated patients, respectively (chi-squared test, p=0.112). Regarding endocrine-related AEs, 12 (6.5%) and none (0%) were observed in pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated patients, respectively (Fisher's exact probability test, p=0.129).

Conclusion: Pembrolizumab and maintenance avelumab therapy provide equivalent oncological outcomes in patients with advanced UC. Although no significant difference was observed, there might be a potential risk of higher endocrine-related AEs due to pembrolizumab compared to avelumab maintenance therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oncological outcomes
16
patients advanced
16
pembrolizumab avelumab
16
maintenance avelumab
12
avelumab therapy
12
pembrolizumab- avelumab-treated
12
pembrolizumab
8
outcomes pembrolizumab
8
pembrolizumab second-line
8
second-line therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: We investigated the perioperative outcome and oncologic safety of performing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through a single axillary incision (NSM-SAI) compared with performing NSM through a conventional incision (NSM-C).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 725 patients who underwent NSM for breast cancer between January 2010 and December 2023; 333 patients who underwent NSM with immediate reconstruction (IR) were enrolled. Surgical outcomes and oncologic outcomes of NSM-C (n = 184), NSM performed through SAI with a freehand approach (NSM-SAI-F; n = 92), and with an endoscopic approach (NSM-SAI-E; n = 57) were demonstrated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity matched analysis].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi

December 2024

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Clinical Transformation of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Yangzhou225001, China.

To investigate the short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical data of patients with mid-low rectal cancer (caudad edge of tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge) treated with laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery in the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University from July 2019 to November 2021. Patients whose anus had not been completely preserved, with malignant obstruction or perforation, with poor anal function indicated by preoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, or with incomplete follow-up information were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is the recommended approach for managing Grade-Group1 (GG1) prostate cancer (PCa). Incorporating MRI at entry improve patient selection and outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate long-term oncological outcomes of patients receiving AS selected with MRI at entry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of the subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC), including divergent differentiation and histologic subtype, in comparison with those of pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were initially treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) between March 2005 and August 2020 at a single institution. Patients with PUC and SUC were compared in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!