Background: Moral distress is a phenomena that occurs following a compromise to moral beliefs. Moral distress has been reported across health professions, including midwifery. Although there are validated tools to assess for moral distress, none have been identified that suit the Australian healthcare system or midwifery.
Aim: The aim of this study was to pilot the Barometer of Moral Distress in Midwifery.
Methods: This study was the fourth stage of a mixed method project. Using a cross-sectional approach, a survey tool including demographic questions, the Barometer of Moral Distress in Midwifery, and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory assessed tool stability, reliability, and validity.
Findings: A total of 103 surveys were completed. A test-retest demonstrated tool reliability and stability (a =.97). Factor analysis confirmed internal consistency; Factor 1 - Professional Identity (a=.91), Factor 2 - Inadequate Resources (a=.85), and Factor 3 - Unethical Cultures (a=.88). Concurrent validity was demonstrated through positive correlations between self-reported types of moral distress with mean scores for each Factor. Strong correlations were identified between work-related burnout and mean scores, while only weak correlations were noted between client-related burnout and mean scores. Only Factor 1 demonstrated a correlation between leaving the profession and mean scores.
Discussion/conclusion: This was the first moral distress tool that assessed both frequency of exposure and psychological outcomes to score moral distress. Findings indicate that moral distress in midwifery is not associated with caring work but with occupational environments. Further research is required to assess self-sacrifice in moral distress.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101592 | DOI Listing |
J Prim Care Community Health
January 2025
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Objectives: This qualitative study explored the beliefs and values influencing healthcare providers' delivery of gender-affirming care (GAC) to transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth amidst current social and political dynamics.
Methods: The study PI conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with providers across states with varying GAC legislation. Responses from 41 providers were analyzed in this paper.
Ethics Hum Res
January 2025
Professor of health humanities and ethics, psychiatry, and public health sciences at the Center for Health Humanities and Ethics at the University of Virginia School of Medicine.
Moral distress occurs when professionals are constrained from taking what they believe to be ethically appropriate actions or are forced to take actions they believe are ethically inappropriate, challenging their professional identities and representing systems-level issues within organizations. Moral distress has been recognized in a variety of health care-related fields; however, the phenomenon is still comparatively unexplored among clinical research professionals (CRPs). In this qualitative study, we interviewed ten CRPs to unearth root causes of moral distress in this ethically unique profession.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Background: Professional quality of life has received widespread concern in nursing over the last few years. Nurses with a high professional quality of life enthusiastically approach their work and provide excellent patient care. On the other hand, poor professional quality of life may affect nurses' quality of care, resulting in job dissatisfaction and jeopardizing patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Healthc Manag
January 2025
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Goal: The objective of this study was to better understand how healthcare systems' unit- and system-level leaders perceive and experience moral distress consultation services, including their utility, efficacy, and sustainability.
Methods: A multimethod design was conducted in tandem across two academic medical centers with longstanding and active moral distress consultation services. Moral distress data for healthcare providers participating in moral distress consultation were collected.
J Am Vet Med Assoc
January 2025
3Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Objective: To document veterinary technicians' (VTs') experiences with medical futility and its subsequent impact on moral distress and attrition from the profession.
Methods: A cross-sectional study using a 56-question web-based, confidential and anonymous survey was distributed through the National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America between January 19 and February 15, 2023.
Results: There were 1,944 responses from approximately 8,500 members (22% response rate).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!