AI Article Synopsis

  • Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) shows promise for treating severe mitral regurgitation, but it's unclear how well clinical trial results translate to everyday patients.
  • In a study analyzing 38,770 M-TEER admissions, most participants had similar characteristics and outcomes compared to those in clinical trials, although non-eligible patients faced significantly higher risks of complications and mortality.
  • The findings suggest that most actual M-TEER patients could have participated in trials, indicating the potential for broader real-world application of these trial results.

Article Abstract

Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for selected patients with severe mitral regurgitation. However, the generalizability of trial results to real-world patients remains uncertain.

Objectives: The authors aimed to compare baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among trial participants with nonparticipants undergoing M-TEER.

Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample database years 2016-2020, M-TEER admissions were identified and categorized into trial participants vs none. We also identified a cohort of trial noneligible patients based on clinical exclusion criteria from pivotal trials. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare in-hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications, length of stay, and hospitalization cost.

Results: Among 38,770 M-TEER admissions from 2016 to 2020, 11,450 (29.5%) were trial participants, 22,975 (59.3%) were eligible nonparticipants, and 2,960 (7.6%) were noneligible. Baseline characteristics and comorbidity profiles were mostly similar between trial participants vs eligible nonparticipants. In-hospital mortality (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.60-1.62), cardiogenic shock (aOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.80-1.42), mechanical circulatory support (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.58-1.41), mechanical ventilation (aOR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.74-1.42), and conversion to mitral valve surgery (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.57-2.03) were not different between both groups. Conversely, M-TEER for noneligible patients was associated with higher rates of mortality (aOR: 6.27; 95% CI: 3.75-10.45) and complications.

Conclusions: The majority of real-world M-TEER patients would have been eligible for clinical trial participation and had comparable clinical profiles and in-hospital outcomes to trial participants. However, noneligible patients had worse in-hospital outcomes compared with trial participants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.063DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trial participants
24
in-hospital outcomes
16
noneligible patients
12
trial
10
clinical trial
8
trial participation
8
transcatheter edge-to-edge
8
edge-to-edge repair
8
baseline characteristics
8
outcomes trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!