A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Surgical productivity recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. | LitMetric

Surgical productivity recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Front Public Health

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Jyoban Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.

Published: February 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical productivity in Japan, building on previous research that noted a decline in 2020.
  • Using data from 18,805 surgical procedures over seven years, the authors applied a specific model to analyze productivity metrics like efficiency and technical change.
  • The findings indicated no significant differences in surgical productivity, efficiency, or technical changes when comparing the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies demonstrated that the surgical productivity regressed in 2020. This study therefore explored whether the COVID-19 pandemic had any significant lasting effect of reducing the surgical productivity in Japan. This is a retrospective observational study which is an extension of the previous ones.

Methods: The authors analyzed 18,805 surgical procedures performed during the study period from April 1 through September 30 in 2016-22. A non-radial and non-oriented Malmquist model under the variable returns-to-scale assumptions was employed. The decision-making unit (DMU) was defined as a surgical specialty department. Inputs were defined as (1) the number of assistants, and (2) the surgical duration. The output was defined as the surgical fee. The study period was divided into 42 one-month periods. The authors added all the inputs and outputs for each DMU during these study periods, and computed its Malmquist index, efficiency change and technical change. The outcome measures were its annual productivity, efficiency, and technical changes between the same months in each year.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in annual productivity, efficiency, and technical changes between pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods.

Discussion: No evidence was found to suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has any significant lasting effect of reducing the surgical productivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896883PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1302732DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical productivity
16
covid-19 pandemic
12
surgical
8
pandemic lasting
8
lasting reducing
8
reducing surgical
8
study period
8
defined surgical
8
annual productivity
8
productivity efficiency
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!