Introduction: Zygomatic implants are an effective solution for rehabilitation of edentulous atrophic maxillae. However, the conventional technique of zygomatic implant placement is invasive, requires a longer healing period and is economically cumbersome. Therefore, the flapless technique of insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation system has been introduced. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of flapless insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation to the conventional flap technique.
Materials And Methods: The study participants were divided into two groups: Group A ( = 20) included patients treated by flapless insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation and Group B ( = 20) included patients treated with zygomatic implants using the flap technique. An analysis of the effectiveness of the implants was done using the concept of quality-adjusted prosthesis years, and an analysis of the costs was done by evaluating the treatment costs at each step. The data were collected, and analysis was done using IBM SPSS software. The Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test was employed to analyse variations in costs and effects between the two groups.
Results: The study showed that the distribution of costs varies across both the categories of the procedure. Group B shows lesser cost-effectiveness as compared to Group A.
Conclusion: The technique of flapless insertion of zygomatic implants is cost-effective. However, further studies considering factors such as time and cost of productivity evaluating the cost-effectiveness should be conducted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883214 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_80_23 | DOI Listing |
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
January 2025
Purpose: The study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes (3.7±0.4yrs) of full-arch immediately loaded fixed maxillary prostheses supported by conventional and unilateral single zygomatic implants versus those supported by conventional and bilateral single zygomatic implants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
January 2025
Desert Ridge Oral Surgery Institute, 20950 N Tatum Boulevard #200, Phoenix, AZ 85050, USA; Private Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Banner University Medical Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Guided zygomatic implant placement surgery has emerged as a promising solution for patients with severe maxillary bone loss, offering precise implant placement and predictable outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art techniques, advantages, challenges, and future directions in guided zygomatic implant surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent
January 2025
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthodontics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Complutense University of Madrid, Ramon y Cajal Research Institute (IRYCIS). Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:
Objectives: To in-vitro evaluate the feasibility and accuracy (trueness and precision) of various intraoral scanners (IOS) to digitize maxillectomy defect models with exposed zygomatic implants in situ.
Material And Methods: Six partially edentulous and edentulous maxillectomy defect models with 2 zygomatic implants each were obtained. References scans were obatined by using a laboratory scanner (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona).
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address:
Introduction: Rehabilitation of patients with hemimaxillectomy presents a challenge. This case report describes the successful use of zygomatic Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructed prosthesis.
Clinical Case Presentation: A 20-year-old female patient presented to the clinic following hemimaxillectomy with soft tissue approximation one year ago.
Objective: Evaluate the feasibility of the midface degloving approach (MDA) in total maxillectomy without orbital exenteration (TMWOE) and reconstruction for sino-nasal neoplasms.
Study Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!