This research seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the distinctive nature of burnout and depression. In a first study, we relied on employee samples from four European countries ( = 5199; 51.27% women; = 43.14). In a second study, we relied on a large sample of patients ( = 5791; 53.70% women; = 39.54) who received a diagnosis of burnout, depressive episode, job strain, or adaptation disorder. Across all samples and subsamples, we relied on the bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling to achieve an optimal disaggregation of the variance shared across our measures of burnout and depression from the variance uniquely associated with each specific subscale included in these measures. Our results supported the value of this representation of participants' responses, as well as their invariance across samples. More precisely, our results revealed a strong underlying global factor representing participants' levels of psychological distress, as well as the presence of equally strong specific factors supporting the distinctive nature of burnout and depression. This means that, although both conditions share common ground (i.e. psychological distress), they are not redundant. Interestingly, our results also unexpectedly suggested that suicidal ideation might represent a distinctive core component of depression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2321358DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

burnout depression
12
distinctive nature
8
nature burnout
8
study relied
8
psychological distress
8
burnout-depression conundrum
4
conundrum investigating
4
investigating construct-relevant
4
construct-relevant multidimensionality
4
multidimensionality countries
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!