AI Article Synopsis

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Dr. Risch medical group utilized a specific RT-PCR testing kit for diagnosing infections in Switzerland and Liechtenstein, which targeted three genes essential for identifying the virus.
  • The emergence of the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7) led to a notable diagnostic issue, where the S-gene target was absent due to genetic deletions, marking it as an early indicator of new variants; this phenomenon was also seen in Omicron but not with the Delta variant.
  • Over two years, the group studied the significance of S-gene target failure (SGTF) as a signal for identifying variants, confirming that differences in cycle threshold values could help distinguish true SGTF cases from discrepancies

Article Abstract

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the Dr. Risch medical group employed the multiplex TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit for large-scale routine diagnostic testing in Switzerland and the principality of Liechtenstein. The TaqPath Kit is a widely used multiplex assay targeting three genes (i.e., ORF1AB, N, S). With emergence of the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant, a diagnostic flaw became apparent as the amplification of the S-gene target was absent in these samples due to a deletion (ΔH69/V70) in the Alpha variant genome. This S-gene target failure (SGTF) was the earliest indication of a new variant emerging and was also observed in subsequent variants such as Omicron BA.1 and BA4/BA.5. The Delta variant and Omicron BA.2 did not present with SGTF. From September 2020 to November 2022, we investigated the applicability of the SGTF as a surrogate marker for emerging variants such as B.1.1.7, B.1.617.2 (Delta), and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/BA.5 in samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 30. Next to true SGTF-positive and SGTF-negative samples, there were also samples presenting with delayed-type S-gene amplification (higher Ct value for S-gene than ORF1ab gene). Among these, a difference of 3.8 Ct values between the S- and ORF1ab genes was found to best distinguish between "true" SGTF and the cycle threshold variability of the assay. Samples above the cutoff were subsequently termed partial SGTF (pSGTF). Variant confirmation was performed by whole-genome sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technology, Oxford, UK) or mutation-specific PCR (TIB MOLBIOL). In total, 17,724 (7.4%) samples among 240,896 positives were variant-confirmed, resulting in an overall sensitivity and specificity of 93.2% [92.7%, 93.7%] and 99.3% [99.2%, 99.5%], respectively. Sensitivity was increased to 98.2% [97.9% to 98.4%] and specificity lowered to 98.9% [98.6% to 99.1%] when samples with pSGTF were included. Furthermore, weekly logistic growth rates (α) and sigmoid's midpoint (t) were calculated based on SGTF data and did not significantly differ from calculations based on comprehensive data from GISAID. The SGTF therefore allowed for a valid real-time estimate for the introduction of all dominant variants in Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10892681PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12020321DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

s-gene target
12
omicron ba1
12
target failure
8
variants switzerland
8
switzerland liechtenstein
8
delta omicron
8
ba1 ba2
8
ba2 ba4/ba5
8
alpha variant
8
cycle threshold
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!