The current surgical guidelines recommend an optimal margin width of 2 mm for the management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, there are still many controversies regarding re-excision when the optimal margin criteria are not met in the first resection. The purpose of this study is to understand the importance of surgical margin width, re-excision, and treatments to avoid additional surgery on locoregional recurrence (LRR). The study is retrospective and analyzed surgical margins, adjuvant treatments, re-excision, and LRR in patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Re-operation for a close margin rate was 13.5%, and the 3-year recurrence was 7.6%. No difference in the LRR was reported among the patients subjected to BCS regardless of the margin width ( = 0.295). The recurrence rate according to margin status was not significant ( = 0.484). Approximately 36.9% (n: 79) patients had resection margins < 2 mm. A sub-analysis of patients with margins < 2 mm showed no difference in the recurrence between the patients treated with a second surgery and those treated with radiation ( = 0.091). The recurrence rate according to margin status in patients with margins < 2 mm was not significant ( = 0.161). The margin was not a predictive factor of LRR = 0.999. Surgical re-excision should be avoided in patients with a focally positive margin and no evidence of the disease at post-surgical imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10886566PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040743DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

margin width
12
patients
10
margin
10
optimal margin
8
recurrence rate
8
rate margin
8
margin status
8
patients margins
8
surgical
5
re-excision
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!