AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the impact of pathogenic germline variants (gBRCAm) on survival rates in young women under 40 diagnosed with breast cancer, focusing on subtype-specific outcomes.
  • Among 473 women analyzed, the most common subtype was HR+/Her2-, with significant variations in clinical subtypes based on gBRCA status.
  • The findings indicate that gBRCAm is linked to better distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, while gBRCAwt TNBC patients have a higher risk of worse survival outcomes.

Article Abstract

Data are scarce on the role of pathogenic germline variants in and (gBRCAm) in subtype-specific survival in young women who develop breast cancer under the age of 40. This retrospective, real-world cohort study assessed the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) of young women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2008 and 2019 while taking into consideration the interaction of clinical subtypes and the gBRCA status. Among 473 women, HR+/Her2- was the most common subtype (49.0%), followed by TNBC (31.3%), HR+/Her2+ (13.7%), and Her2+/HR- (5.9%). The gBRCA status was known for 319 cases (gBRCAwt (wild-type - without pathogenic variants in or ): 204, gBRCA1m: 83, gBRCA2m: 31, 1 patient with both). The distribution of clinical subtypes varied depending on the gBRCA status ( < 0.001). In survival analysis with a median follow-up of 43 months, the unadjusted DDFS and OS were worse for gBRCAwt TNBC compared to both HR+ subtypes, but not for gBRCAm TNBC patients. T-stage, nodal involvement, and the gBRCA status were identified as significant for survival in TNBC. In TNBC, gBRCAm was associated with better DDFS and OS than gBRCAwt (5-year DDFS 81.4% vs. 54.3%, = 0.012 and 5-year OS 96.7% vs. 62.7%, < 0.001). In contrast, in HR+/Her2- patients, gBRCAm patients showed a tendency for worse survival, though not statistically significant. Subtype-specific survival in young women with breast cancer needs to be evaluated in interaction with the gBRCA status. For TNBC, gBRCAm is of favorable prognostic value for overall survival, while patients with gBRCAwt TNBC need to be considered to have the highest risk for adverse survival outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887122PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040738DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gbrca status
20
survival young
16
young women
16
breast cancer
16
subtype-specific survival
12
survival
9
women breast
8
clinical subtypes
8
gbrcawt tnbc
8
tnbc gbrcam
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!