Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths.

Nat Commun

Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Viikki Biocenter 3, P.O. Box 65, 40014, Helsinki, Finland.

Published: February 2024

Natural selection generally favours phenotypic variability in camouflaged organisms, whereas aposematic organisms are expected to evolve a more uniform warning coloration. However, no comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic consequences of predator selection in aposematic and cryptic species exists. Using state-of-the-art image analysis, we examine 2800 wing images of 82 moth species accessed via three online museum databases. We test whether anti-predator strategy (i.e., camouflage or aposematism) explains intraspecific variation in wing colour and pattern across northern hemisphere moths. In addition, we test two mutually non-exclusive, ecological hypotheses to explain variation in colour pattern: diel-activity or dietary-niche. In this work, taking into account phylogenetic relationships, moth phenotypic variability is best explained by anti-predator strategy with camouflaged moths being more variable in wing patterning than aposematic species.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10891176PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45329-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phenotypic variability
12
predator selection
8
anti-predator strategy
8
colour pattern
8
phenotypic
4
selection phenotypic
4
variability cryptic
4
aposematic
4
cryptic aposematic
4
aposematic moths
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!