Gender oncology: recommendations and consensus of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

ESMO Open

Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, Perrino Hospital, Brindisi; President of AIOM Foundation (Italian Association of Medical Oncology), Italy.

Published: February 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The field of oncology has increasingly recognized gender differences in cancer epidemiology and treatment responses over the past 20 years, emphasizing the need to consider sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations.
  • A working group led by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology developed guidelines through a consensus conference approach, evaluating various topics like healthcare organization and cancer biology, and included successful case studies to support their findings.
  • The group identified 50 recommendations from a review of 42 articles and additional expert input, highlighting the importance of gender-specific criteria for both research and patient care in oncology.

Article Abstract

Background: Following the development of gender medicine in the past 20 years, more recently in the field of oncology an increasing amount of evidence suggests gender differences in the epidemiology of cancers, as well as in the response and toxicity associated with therapies. In a gender approach, critical issues related to sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations must also be considered.

Materials And Methods: A working group of opinion leaders approved by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has been set up with the aim of drafting a shared document on gender oncology. Through the 'consensus conference' method of the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) variant, the members of the group evaluated statements partly from the scientific literature and partly produced by the experts themselves [good practice points (GPPs)], on the following topics: (i) Healthcare organisation, (ii) Therapy, (iii) Host factors, (iv) Cancer biology, and (v) Communication and social interventions. Finally, in support of each specific topic, they considered it appropriate to present some successful case studies.

Results: A total of 42 articles met the inclusion criteria, from which 50 recommendations were extracted. Panel participants were given the opportunity to propose additional evidence from studies not included in the research results, from which 32 statements were extracted, and to make recommendations not derived from literature such as GPPs, four of which have been developed. After an evaluation of relevance by the panel, it was found that 81 recommendations scored >7, while 3 scored between 4 and 6.9, and 2 scored below 4.

Conclusions: This consensus and the document compiled thereafter represent an attempt to evaluate the available scientific evidence on the theme of gender oncology and to suggest standard criteria both for scientific research and for the care of patients in clinical practice that should take gender into account.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937209PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102243DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gender oncology
12
gender
8
italian association
8
association medical
8
medical oncology
8
oncology aiom
8
scored scored
8
oncology
5
recommendations
4
oncology recommendations
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!