Comparative life cycle assessment of light frame timber and reinforced concrete masonry structural systems for single-family houses in Luxembourg.

The building sector's significant greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption present added challenges to meeting European climate commitments amidst rapid population growth. In Luxembourg, single-family houses dominate the residential buildings, noticeably contributing to construction waste and CO emissions. This study compares the environmental impacts of a three-story reinforced concrete masonry single-family house and an identical timber building in Luxembourg, emphasizing greenhouse gas emissions and embodied energy. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was conducted using Building Information Modelling (BIM) models to analyze the global warming potential and primary energy requirements. Environmental product declarations from the producers and the ÖKOBAUDAT German database were used to determine the environmental impacts of the materials. The results show that the timber building outperforms the concrete building with a 43.5% lower global warming potential, while the concrete building demonstrates a 15.6% reduction in primary energy demand. This aligns with the average outcomes of seven similar studies discussed in this paper, at 33.2% and 4.7%, respectively. Moreover, the timber building is 78.6% lighter than the concrete one. When evaluating benefits and loads beyond the system boundary, the timber building provides 3.6 and 4 times greater advantages in terms of global warming potential and primary energy, respectively, compared to the reinforced concrete masonry building. Additionally, the study explores the impact of reusing the floors in the timber building. The cradle-to-grave LCA reveals that reusing the timber slabs improves the building's global warming potential and primary energy by 2.4% and 1.2%, respectively. However, when considering the benefits and loads beyond the system boundary, floor system reuse exhibits a 38.9% surge in global warming advantages while reducing primary energy benefits by 28.1%. The findings advocate for a policy promoting timber construction and reuse in Luxembourg, aiming to achieve the net-zero emission target by 2050.