A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Improving respiratory signal prediction with a deep neural network and simple changes to the input and output data format. | LitMetric

To improve respiratory gating accuracy and radiation treatment throughput, we developed a generalized model based on a deep neural network (DNN) for predicting any given patient's respiratory motion.Our model uses long short-term memory (LSTM) based on a recurrent neural network (RNN), and improves upon common techniques. The first improvement is that the data input is not a one-dimensional sequence, but two-dimensional block data. This shortens the input sequence length, reducing computation time. Second, the output is not a scalar, but a sequence prediction. This increases the amount of available data, allowing improved prediction accuracy. For training and evaluation of our model, 434 sets of real-time position management data were retrospectively collected from clinical studies. The data were separated in a ratio of 4:1, with the larger set used for training models and the remaining set used for testing. We measured the accuracy of respiratory signal prediction and amplitude-based gating with prediction windows equaling 133, 333, and 533 ms. This new model was compared with the original LSTM and a non-recurrent DNN model.The mean absolute errors with the prediction window at 133, 333 and 533 ms were 0.036, 0.084, 0.119 with our model; 0.049, 0.14, 0.246 with the original LSTM-based model; and 0.041, 0.119, 0.16 with the non-recurrent DNN model, respectively. The computation time were 0.66 ms with our model; 0.63 ms the original LSTM-based model; 1.60 ms the non-recurrent DNN model, respectively. The accuracies of amplitude-based gating with the same prediction window settings and a duty cycle of approximately 50% were 98.3%, 95.8% and 92.7% with our model, 97.6%, 93.9% and 87.2% with the original LSTM-based model; and 97.9%, 94.3% and 89.5% with the non-recurrent DNN model, respectively.Our RNN algorithm for respiratory signal prediction successfully estimated tumor positions. We believe it will be useful in respiratory signal prediction technology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad2b92DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

respiratory signal
16
signal prediction
16
non-recurrent dnn
16
model
13
neural network
12
original lstm-based
12
lstm-based model
12
dnn model
12
prediction
9
deep neural
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!