Research regarding pharmacist-driven renal dosing policies has focused on cost savings or prevention of adverse drug events. However, little is known about how these policies influence time from order signature to order verification or how this efficiency may reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes. The primary endpoint compared time from prescriber electronic order signature to pharmacist electronic order verification between pre- and post-renal dosing policy implementation. The secondary endpoint evaluated electrocardiogram QTc prolongation attributed to fluconazole accumulation in renal impairment. This retrospective analysis included adults with a creatine clearance ⩽50 mL/min who received at least two inpatient doses from a 34-medication renal dosing protocol between January-February 2020 and April-May 2020. 502 patients met eligibility for the primary outcome. The pre- and post-policy cohorts shared similar baseline characteristics. Time from order signature to verification was 9 and 8 min in the pre- and post-policy groups, respectively ( = 0.0861). In all, 56 patients met inclusion criteria for the secondary outcome. The QTc interval during fluconazole increased relative to baseline in 3 of 7 (43%) pre-policy and 4 of 5 (80%) post-policy. The QTc interval exceeded 500 ms in two patients, both in the post-policy cohort. There was no difference in order signature to verification time. Post-policy fluconazole renal adjustment did not reduce QTc prolongation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878201PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121241233223DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

order signature
16
renal dosing
12
order verification
12
pharmacist-driven renal
8
dosing policy
8
verification time
8
time order
8
electronic order
8
qtc prolongation
8
patients met
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!