A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Performance of QUiPP App v.2 tool for prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women attending preterm specialist clinic: external validation study. | LitMetric

Objective: To validate externally the QUiPP App v.2 algorithms in an independent cohort of high-risk asymptomatic women attending a preterm birth (PTB) surveillance clinic in Ireland.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study assessing discrimination and calibration of the QUiPP App v.2 at six predetermined clinical timepoints (PTB at < 30, < 34 and < 37 weeks of pregnancy and PTB within 1, 2 and 4 weeks of testing). Discrimination was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and sensitivity at fixed false-positive rates of 5%, 10% and 20%. Model calibration was assessed to evaluate the concordance between expected and observed outcomes. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. No adjustments for treatment effects were made.

Results: Overall, 762 women with 1660 PTB surveillance clinic visits using the QUiPP App v.2 between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed. The study population included 142 (18.6%) patients who later experienced PTB. The QuiPP App's performance in the prediction of short-term outcomes, such as birth within 1 week (AUC, 0.866 (95% CI, 0.755-0.955)), 2 weeks (AUC, 0.721 (95% CI, 0.569-0.854)) and 4 weeks (AUC, 0.775 (95% CI, 0.699-0.842)), and delivery at < 30 weeks (AUC, 0.747 (95% CI, 0.613-0.865)), was superior to its ability to predict longer-term outcomes (PTB at < 37 weeks: AUC, 0.631 (95% CI, 0.596-0.668)). Calibration was generally good for low-risk results, as the predicted risk in these patients tended to match the observed incidence. However, in women deemed to be at greater risk of PTB, the predicted probability superseded the observed incidence of PTB.

Conclusions: The QUiPP App v.2 accurately discriminates women who are at short-term risk of PTB. A 'treatment paradox' may influence calibration in high-risk women. Further research is needed to ascertain if QuiPP treatment thresholds can be safely adjusted in women receiving prophylactic treatment to prevent PTB, and whether this improves the outcome. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.27619DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quipp app
12
preterm birth
8
women attending
8
attending preterm
8
performance quipp
4
app tool
4
tool prediction
4
prediction preterm
4
birth asymptomatic
4
asymptomatic high-risk
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!