Incremental diagnostic value of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis over conventional unenhanced CT.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images derived from unenhanced dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by comparison with conventional unenhanced CT.

Materials And Methods: Eighty-nine patients with gallbladder stones who had undergone both abdominal unenhanced dual-energy CT and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were retrospectively included. There were 53 men and 36 women, with a mean age of 54 ± 13 (standard deviation) years (age range: 41-67 years). VNC and conventional CT images were generated. Two independent radiologists evaluated the presence of choledocholithiasis in three reading sessions (session 1, conventional unenhanced CT images; session 2, VNC images; session 3, conventional unenhanced CT plus VNC images). The reading time to identify choledocholithiasis was recorded. Inter-reader agreement was measured by using the Cohen kappa (κ) test. Incremental diagnostic value of VNC imaging when combined with conventional unenhanced CT was assessed based on discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). The diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and that of MRCP were compared using DeLong test.

Results: Using the standard of reference, 39 patients (39/89; 44%) had choledocholithiasis. The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was improved using VNC images in combination with conventional unenhanced CT (AUC, 0.877; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.808, 0.947) by comparison with conventional unenhanced CT alone (AUC, 0.789; 95% CI: 0.718, 0.877) (P = 0.033) and achieved almost perfect inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.00) for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, without lengthening the median reading time (16.2 s for the combination of conventional CT and VNC images vs. 14.7 s for conventional CT alone; P= 0.325). Based on decision curve analysis, adding VNC imaging to conventional unenhanced CT resulted in a higher net benefit among most of decision thresholds. No differences in diagnostic performance were found between the combination of conventional unenhanced CT and VNC imaging (AUC, 0.877; 95% CI: 0.808, 0.947) and MRCP (AUC, 0.913; 95% CI: 0.852, 0.974) (P= 0.458).

Conclusions: VNC images derived from dual-energy unenhanced CT have incremental diagnostic value for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Unenhanced CT in a dual-energy mode may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.