Introduction: Biologicals have become a cornerstone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. The increased risk of serious infections associated with their use is well-established. Non-serious infections, however, occur more frequently and are associated with a high socioeconomic burden and impact on quality of life but have not received the same attention in the literature to date. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the various non-serious infections reported in RA patients using biologicals and their experienced burden.

Materials And Methods: The Dutch Biologic Monitor was a prospective observational study that included adults with rheumatoid arthritis and biological use who answered bimonthly questionnaires on the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) they experienced from their biological and reported the associated impact score (ranging from 1, no impact, to 5, very high impact). ADRs were assigned a MedDRA code by pharmacovigilance experts and labeled as definite, probable, possible or no infection by infectious disease professionals. Descriptive statistics were performed using medians and interquartile ranges.

Results: A total of 586 patients were included in the final analysis. Eighty-five patients (14.5%) reported a total of 421 ADRs labeled as probable or definite infections by the experts. Patient-assigned burden was ADR-specific. Upper respiratory tract infections were most frequently reported and had a high rate of recurrence or persistence, with a median impact score of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-3.0) which remained stable over time.

Discussion: Non-serious infections significantly outnumbered serious infections in this real-life cohort of RA patients using biologicals (77.1 non-serious infections and 1.3 serious infections per 100 patient years, respectively). Infections in the upper respiratory tract were rated as having an average burden, which remained constant over a long period of time. Awareness of the impact of recurrent and chronic non-serious infections may enable healthcare professionals to timely treat and maybe even prevent them, which would lessen the associated personal and socioeconomic burden.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878515PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296821PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-serious infections
24
infections
12
rheumatoid arthritis
12
serious infections
12
socioeconomic burden
8
patients biologicals
8
impact score
8
upper respiratory
8
respiratory tract
8
impact
6

Similar Publications

Background: NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as aspirin or ibuprofen, accompanied by chronic rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps) or asthma. The prevalence of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs is estimated to be 2%. The first line of treatment is the avoidance of NSAIDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Second-line treatment options for persistent, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) cervical cancer are limited. We investigated the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of the therapeutic DNA-based vaccine VB10.16 combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)16-positive r/m cervical cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: The purpose of this review is to highlight high impact clinical research in axial spondyloarthritis that was published between May 2023 and April 2024. These publications were presented at the SPARTAN annual meeting in May 2024.

Recent Findings: Three publications addressed the rate and predictors of radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Describe tofacitinib safety from an integrated analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Method: Pooled data from Phase 2 (NCT01786668; 04/2013-03/2015)/Phase 3 (NCT03502616; 06/2018-08/2020) RCTs in AS patients were analyzed (3 overlapping cohorts): 16-week placebo-controlled (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily [BID] [n = 185]; placebo [n = 187]); 48-week only-tofacitinib 5 mg BID (n = 316); 48-week all-tofacitinib (≥ 1 dose of tofacitinib 2, 5, or 10 mg BID; n = 420). Baseline 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was determined in patients without history of ASCVD (48-week cohorts).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Haematopoietic gene therapy of non-conditioned patients with Fanconi anaemia-A: results from open-label phase 1/2 (FANCOLEN-1) and long-term clinical trials.

Lancet

December 2025

Biomedical Innovation Unit, Center for Research on Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Network Research Center for Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain; Sanitary Research Institute Fundación Jiménez Díaz (U.A.M), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:

Background: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the standard treatment for bone marrow failure (BMF) in patients with Fanconi anaemia, but transplantation-associated complications such as an increased incidence of subsequent cancer are frequent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the infusion of autologous gene-corrected haematopoietic stem cells as an alternative therapy for these patients.

Methods: This was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase 1/2 clinical trial (FANCOLEN-1) and long-term follow-up trial (up to 7 years post-treatment) in Spain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!