Comparison of life cycle assessment between hydrogen production from silicon waste and alkaline water electrolysis.

With global warming becoming increasingly severe, environmental issues are receiving international attention. Crystalline silicon is an indispensable and important raw material for photovoltaic and semiconductor fields, but the cutting of crystalline silicon materials generates a large amount of silicon wastes. This article evaluates the environmental impact of a hydrogen production process using diamond-wire sawing silicon waste (DSSW) using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. For comparison, it was also analyzed the environmental impact of the alkaline water electrolysis (AEL) hydrogen production route. In the DSSW alkaline catalyzed hydrolysis (DACH) hydrogen production route, the hydrogen production stage accounts for the main contribution of nine environmental impact indexes, including GWP, PED, ADP, AP, EP, ODP, ET, HT-cancer, and HT-non cancer, exceeding 56 %. Whereas for the AEL route, the environmental impacts of the electrolytic cell manufacturing stage can be neglected, and the operating stage contributes almost all the environmental impacts, contributing more than 92 % to the twelve environmental impact indexes. Compared to the AEL route, the DACH route has higher environmental impacts, with GWP index reaching 87.78 kg CO -eq/kg H, PED index reaching 1772.90 MJ/kg H, and IWU index reaching 622.37 kg/kg H which are 2.85, 4.07 and 7.56 times higher than the former, respectively. Although the environmental impact of the DACH route is significant, most of its indirect impacts were caused by the use of raw materials, and the energy consumption and direct environmental impact are both low. The environmental impact of the AEL route is mainly indirect effects generated due to the use of electricity. If clean renewable energy sources (e.g., solar PV, hydropower, geothermal or biofuels), were used for the AEL route, all twelve environmental impact indexes would be significantly reduced.