AI Article Synopsis

  • - Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) lasts over 3 months without a clear cause and is linked to emotional distress; previous research highlights spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) as a potentially effective treatment.
  • - A recent study with 98 individuals suffering from CPLBP tested the efficacy of SMT over 12 sessions compared to a control group, measuring pain intensity and various psychological factors.
  • - Results showed that SMT significantly reduced pain intensity but not disability, with a noted decrease in local hyperalgesia and pain catastrophizing, suggesting that while SMT is beneficial, understanding the psychological impacts requires further investigation.

Article Abstract

Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0-100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included pressure pain thresholds in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread mechanical hyperalgesia (P < .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (P < .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: -11.7 [95% confidence interval, -11.0 to -12.5], P = .01), but not disability (P = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified. PERSPECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

low pain
12
individuals cplbp
12
chronic primary
8
primary low
8
spinal manipulative
8
manipulative therapy
8
mechanical hyperalgesia
8
pain catastrophizing
8
randomized placebo-controlled
8
placebo-controlled dual-blind
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!