Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
While some MRI systems offer a "pause" function, combining it with the PROPELLER method for image quality improvement remains underexplored. This study investigated whether repositioning the head after pausing during PROPELLER imaging enhances image quality. All brain phantom images in this study were obtained using a 3.0 T MRI and acquired using the fast spin-echo T2WI-based PROPELLER with motion correction. By combining the angle of rotational motion of the head phantom and the number of repositioning after a pause, two studies including seven trials were performed. Increasing the rotation angle decreased the image quality; however, pausing the image and repositioning the head phantom to the original angle improved the image quality. A similar result was obtained by repositioning the angle closer to its original angle. Experiments with multiple head movements showed that pausing the scan and repositioning the phantom with each movement improved image quality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00784-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!