Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To investigate long-term outcomes after short or long fusion for adult spinal deformity using lateral interbody fusion.
Summary Of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is commonly used in adult spinal deformity surgery. Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported, but not long-term outcomes. Lateral interbody fusion with strong ability to correct deformity may allow the selection of short fusion techniques.
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults who underwent this surgery with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Short fusion with the uppermost instrumented vertebra in the lumbar spine was performed in patients without degenerative changes at the thoracolumbar junction (S-group); others underwent long fusion with the uppermost instrumented vertebra in the thoracic spine (L-group). We assessed radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Results: Short fusion was performed in 29 of 54 patients. One patient per group required revision surgery. Of the remainder, with similar preoperative characteristics and deformity correction between groups, correction loss (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, P =0.003; pelvic tilt, P =0.005; sagittal vertical axis, P ˂0.001) occurred within 2 years postoperatively in the S-group, and sagittal vertical axis continued to increase until the 5-year follow-up ( P =0.021). Although there was a significant change in Oswestry disability index in the S-group ( P =0.031) and self-image of Scoliosis Research Society 22r score in both groups ( P =0.045 and 0.02) from 2- to 5-year follow-up, minimum clinically important differences were not reached. At 5-year follow-up, there was a significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index ( P =0.013) and Scoliosis Research Society 22r scores (function: P =0.028; pain: P =0.003; subtotal: P =0.006) between the groups, but satisfaction scores were comparable and Oswestry Disability Index score (29.8%) in the S-group indicated moderate disability.
Conclusions: Health-related quality of life was maintained between 2- and 5-year follow-up in both groups. Short fusion may be an option for patients without degenerative changes at the thoracolumbar junction.
Level Of Evidence: III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001583 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: Combining oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has been proposed to reduce cage subsidence, especially in osteoporotic spines. Recently, anterolateral screw-rod fixation has gained interest as it allows direct pathology observation and avoids a posterior approach. However, controversies exist between anterolateral screw fixation systems and traditional PPSF due to variations in osteoporotic vertebral mineral density, screw fixation positions, and fixation methods (bicortical vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No.139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, P.R. China.
Objective: The postoperative recovery of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) requires further study. This study aimed to establish and validate a predictive model for functional recovery in patients with LDH and explore associated risk factors.
Method: Patients with LDH undergoing PLIF admitted from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022 were included, and patient data were prospectively collected through follow-up.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
January 2025
Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery has become increasingly popular in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. The optimal structure for stable double-segment fixation remains unclear.
Objective: To compare the biomechanical changes of unilateral fixation versus bilateral fixation in patients with lumbar degeneration undergoing double-segment TLIF surgery, and to explore the stability and feasibility of unilateral double-segment fixation.
JOR Spine
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Luzhou Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Disorders, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Southwest Medical University Luzhou Sichuan Province People's Republic of China.
Background: There are differences in the extent of excision of articular processes, spinal processes and posterior ligamentum complexes (PLC) for posterior approach lumbar interbody fusion. Given that the biomechanical significance of these structures has been verified and that deterioration of the biomechanical environment is the main trigger for complications in both fused and adjacent motion segments, changes in decompression ranges may affect the potential risk of adjacent segmental disease (ASD) biomechanically; however, this topic has yet to be identified.
Methods: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with different decompression strategies was simulated in a well-validated lumbosacral model.
Clin Spine Surg
November 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA.
Study Design: A meta-analysis approach to a systematic review.
Objective: Perform a systematic review to identify all reports directly comparing outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) using static versus expandable interbody cages. Specifically focusing on periprocedural complications, intraoperative morbidity, and fusion outcomes.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!