Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Can physiotherapy with a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask improve peripheral ventilation inhomogeneity, a typical feature of children with cystic fibrosis (cwCF)? To answer this question, we used the nitrogen multiple-breath washout (NMBW) test to measure diffusion-convection-dependent inhomogeneity arising within the intracinar compartment (S*VT).
Methods: For this randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial, two NMBW tests were performed near the hospital discharge date: one before and the other after PEP mask therapy (1 min of breathing through a flow-dependent PEP device attached to a face mask, followed by three huffs and one cough repeated 10 times) by either a standard (10-15 cmH0) or a sham (<5 cmH0) procedure on two consecutive mornings. Deception entailed misinforming the subjects about the nature of the study; also the NMBW operators were blinded to treatment allocation. Study outcomes were assessed with mixed-effect models.
Results: The study sample was 19 cwCF (ten girls), aged 11.4 (2.7) years. The adjusted S*VT mean difference between the standard and the sham procedure was -0.015 (90% confidence interval [CI]: -∞ to 0.025) L. There was no statistically significant difference in S*VT and lung clearance index between the two procedures: -0.005 (95% CI: -0.019 to 0.01) L and 0.49 (95% CI: -0.05 to 1.03) turnovers, respectively.
Conclusion: Our findings do not support evidence for an immediate effect of PEP mask physiotherapy on S*VT with pressure range 10-15 cmH0. Measurement with the NMBW and the crossover design were found to be time-consuming and unsuitable for a short-term study of airway clearance techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.26915 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!