Introduction: Pericervical root dentin is decisive for the long-term mechanical integrity of root-filled teeth. Current treatment protocol does not include a customized step to determine the pretreatment residual pericervical root dentin.
Objective: To determine and compare the residual root dentin and canal width using digital periapical radiography (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the apical limit of the pericervical area (PCA) in mandibular first molars.
Methods: DPR and CBCT images of 60 patients with age between 22 and 76 years were used to determine (a) the mesiodistal widths of the root canal (pericervical dimensions [PCL]-C) and the root (PCL-R) of mandibular first molars at the apical limit of the PCA and (b) the intracanal distance from the apical limit of the PCA to the radiographic apex (intracanal distance [ICD]). The correlation between the PCL and ICD measurements obtained from DPR and CBCT were evaluated.
Results: Values between 0.10-0.80 mm and 0.00-1.10 mm were obtained for PCL-C using DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The PCL values between 0.90-2.30 mm and 0.00-2.30 mm were obtained from DPR and CBCT respectively (95% CI). The ICD ranged between 4.6-12.3 mm in DPR and 4.40-12.0 mm in CBCT (95% CI). The comparative analysis showed differences from -0.9 to 0.5 mms for PCL and -2.00 to 1.5 mms for ICD between DPR and CBCT techniques respectively.
Conclusion: The PCL and ICD determined from DPR and CBCT provided the pericervical dentin metrics that could be utilized clinically as a guideline for decision-making in endodontic treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.003 | DOI Listing |
Tomography
August 2024
Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
This study reviews the two most important and frequently used systems of tomography used in dentistry today. These are the dental panoramic radiograph (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The importance of the DPR has been accentuated by the recent COVID-19 pandemic, as it does not produce an aerosol.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDentomaxillofac Radiol
June 2024
Department of Stomatology, Public Health, and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Objective: To compare digital panoramic radiography (DPR) and cone beam CT (CBCT) in the detection and classification of pulp calcifications in posterior teeth in relation to tooth condition and its location.
Methods: Two hundred and fifty patients with simultaneous DPR and CBCT scans were selected from a dental image bank. For each posterior tooth, its condition was registered (healthy, restored, or decayed).
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
July 2024
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Canadian Medical Center, Sharqe, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Purpose: To compare the functional and esthetic outcomes of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) and conventional dorsal hump reduction (DHR) in primary rhinoplasty using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods: In our randomized prospective double-blinded clinical trial, 50 patients had dorsal nasal hump surgery between October 2021 and November 2022 in our tertiary referral center. All surgeries were done by the same surgeon.
J Endod
May 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Introduction: Pericervical root dentin is decisive for the long-term mechanical integrity of root-filled teeth. Current treatment protocol does not include a customized step to determine the pretreatment residual pericervical root dentin.
Objective: To determine and compare the residual root dentin and canal width using digital periapical radiography (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the apical limit of the pericervical area (PCA) in mandibular first molars.
Radiat Environ Biophys
November 2023
School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
The objectives of the present study were to assess Fractal Dimension (FD) values in the mandible cortical bone obtained from digital periapical radiographs (DPR), high-resolution microtomography (µCT), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), by two processing methods: binarization (FD.b) and grayscale-based method (FD.f) and, finally, to identify the correlation among these values with other micro-architectural parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!