Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Extensive skin graft necrosis after auricle reconstruction surgery is a thorny problem for plastic surgeons. Four unilateral microtia patients were enrolled for extensive skin graft necrosis after ear elevation surgery. Early debridement and daily dressing changes were important for preoperative preparation. Surgical treatments involved local flaps and secondary split-thickness skin graft. After 3 to 12 months of follow-up, clear surface structures and obvious auricular sulcus were shown in all 4 patients. No cartilage exposure, skin necrosis, healing impairment, or other complications were found. We attribute the cause of extensive skin graft necrosis to subcutaneous hematoma. Local skin flaps and split-thickness skin grafting can be effective treatments for such situations. The use of temporoparietal fascial flap is unnecessary when poor graft survival is caused by subcutaneous hematoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010039 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!