How has our primary-care NHS-IAPT provision for PTSD adapted to the pandemic? A service evaluation of recovery pre-COVID-19 and peri-COVID-19.

Background: Mental health issues have been an ongoing major cause of global disability exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The unique challenges have been the high contagiousness of COVID-19 and atypical PTSD presentations e.g., ICU-PTSD. This has led to increased demand on mental health services which have had to vary their provision for example working remotely vs. the traditional face-to-face. The pandemic has also exposed the preexisting health inequalities related to sociodemographic variables. In the UK, NHS-IAPT is the main primary-care provider which has suffered these repercussions. Research from COVID-19 and previous viral outbreaks has estimated an increase in the prevalence of PTSD. Although services have been urged to monitor their provision, research on PTSD remains scanty. The current NHS-IAPT service was concerned about these ramifications of the pandemic and also wished to address the gap in the research. The aim was to conduct an evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 on PTSD recovery. The first question evaluated the impact, and the second question evaluated the associated variables.

Methods: The study employed a quantitative data analysis method. Data were extracted and analysed from the electronic database, IAPTus. The study evaluated PTSD recovery rates during pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic periods. The comparisons determined the impact of the pandemic as well as what recovery variables were significant. The data were analysed statistically using both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (t-test and Chi-square). The data were analyzed in reference to the national NHS-IAPT standards via NHS-Digital.

Results: The findings suggest that the pandemic had no significant impact on overall PTSD recovery rates, which also aligned with the national standards. These recovery rates fell below the target national standard of 50% regardless of the pandemic. Several client, service and treatment variables were shown to be associated with PTSD recovery rates.

Conclusions: This evaluation highlights a pre-existing problem around the persistently low PTSD recovery rates. It also identifies variables that warrant further research in order to improve PTSD service-provision and mitigate any long-term pandemic impacts. This study also provides information for other services wishing to enhance their PTSD recovery rates.