AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares outcomes of conservative vs. surgical treatments for distal hamstring tendon injuries, focusing on patient-reported results and return to sports.
  • Researchers reviewed 18 clinical studies involving 67 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment method based on return-to-sports rates and times.
  • Results show that 92.3% of patients who had surgery returned to sports in about 4.2 months, while only 46.4% of those initially treated conservatively succeeded in returning, averaging 3.6 months, with a significant percentage of those needing surgery later on.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the patient-reported outcomes and return to sports of the conservative and surgical treatment of distal hamstring tendon injuries.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two reviewers searched PubMed, Scopus and Virtual Health Library databases in January 2023. Clinical studies evaluating conservative or surgical management outcomes of distal hamstring tendon injuries were considered eligible for this systematic review if predefined criteria were fulfilled: (1) published in English or Spanish; (2) evaluated any of the following: patient-reported outcomes, return-to-sports rate (RTS-R) or return-to-sports time (RTS-T). Data were presented in tables using absolute values from individual studies and derived pooled percentages.

Results: Eighteen studies were included for 67 patients and 68 distal hamstring tendon injuries. Initially, 39 patients (58.2%) underwent surgical treatment, whereas 28 (41.8%) were treated conservatively. Among conservative treatment patients, 15 failed and had to be operated on (53.6%), all with distal semitendinosus tendon injuries. Anchor fixation was the technique of choice in 20 lesions (36.4%), tenodesis in 16 (29.1%), tenectomy in 14 (25.5%) and sutures were preferred in five (9%). Thirteen out of 28 patients (46.4%) undergoing initial conservative treatment returned to sports at a mean of 3.6 months (range 1 week to 12 months), in contrast to surgical treatment, in which 36 out of 39 patients (92.3%) returned at a mean of 4.2 months (range 6 weeks to 12 months). Additionally, 14 of 15 patients (93.3%) converted to surgical treatment after failed conservative treatment returned to sports at a mean of 7.6 months after injury.

Conclusion: Initial surgical treatment of distal hamstring tendon injuries yields a high RTS-R (92.3%) at a mean of 4.2 months. Furthermore, 15 out of 28 patients (53.6%) initially treated conservatively had to be operated on, delaying the RTS-T (mean 7.6 months after injury) without affecting their RTS-R.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12075DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical treatment
24
distal hamstring
20
hamstring tendon
20
tendon injuries
20
treatment distal
12
conservative treatment
12
return-to-sports rate
8
systematic review
8
patient-reported outcomes
8
conservative surgical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!