AI Article Synopsis

  • Second-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ≤ 49% PD-L1 expression has limited effectiveness, and there is a need to understand predictors of its efficacy after platinum-based chemotherapy.
  • A study involving 54 advanced NSCLC patients in Japan found that those who did not experience disease progression after first-line chemotherapy had significantly better response rates and overall survival when treated with ICI monotherapy compared to those who had disease progression.
  • Maintaining a non-progressive disease status after chemotherapy emerged as a key independent prognostic factor for better outcomes with ICI therapy, along with a trend suggesting that a modified Glasgow Prognostic Score of 0 could correlate with longer survival.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of second-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is limited in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ≤ 49% PD-L1 expression. Although chemoimmunotherapy is a promising strategy, platinum-based chemotherapy followed by ICI monotherapy is often used to avoid synergistic adverse events. However, predictors of the efficacy of ICI monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC with ≤ 49% PD-L1 expression remain scarce.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated 54 advanced or recurrent NSCLC patients with ≤ 49% PD-L1 expression who were treated with second-line ICI monotherapy following disease progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy at nine hospitals in Japan. The impact of response to platinum-based chemotherapy on the efficacy of subsequent ICI monotherapy was investigated.

Results: The response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was divided into two groups: the non-progressive disease (PD) group, which included patients who did not experience disease progression after four cycles of chemotherapy, and the PD group, which included patients who showed initial PD or could not maintain disease control during the four cycles of chemotherapy and switched to second-line ICI monotherapy. Among the 54 patients, 32 and 22 were classified into the non-PD and PD groups, respectively. The non-PD group showed better response rates (p = 0.038) and longer overall survival (OS) with ICI monotherapy (p = 0.023) than the PD group. Multivariate analysis identified that maintaining a non-PD status after four cycles of chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for ICI monotherapy (p = 0.046). Moreover, patients with a modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) of 0 showed a tendency for longer OS with ICI monotherapy (p = 0.079), and there was a significant correlation between maintaining non-PD after four cycles of chemotherapy and an mGPS of 0 (p = 0.045).

Conclusion: Maintaining a non-PD status after four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was a predictor of OS after second-line ICI monotherapy. These findings will help physicians select the most suitable treatment option for NSCLC patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and switched to second-line treatment. Those who experienced early PD during platinum-based chemotherapy should not be treated with ICI monotherapy in the second-line setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853418PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1303543DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ici monotherapy
40
platinum-based chemotherapy
36
pd-l1 expression
16
cycles chemotherapy
16
chemotherapy
13
nsclc patients
12
≤ 49%
12
49% pd-l1
12
second-line ici
12
maintaining non-pd
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!