A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Local recurrence risk factors and outcomes in minimally invasive thermal ablation for liver tumors: a single-institution analysis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation (MITA) is a challenging procedure used to treat liver tumors, with concerns about its effectiveness in controlling local disease.
  • A study analyzed 207 patients who underwent MITA from 2019 to 2022, finding that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) had a higher risk of local recurrence compared to microwave ablation (MWA), especially when combined with surgical resection.
  • The research suggests that MWA might lower local recurrence rates compared to RFA, and that combining MITA with liver resection could increase local recurrence risks, indicating a need for further studies to validate these findings.

Article Abstract

Background: Minimally Invasive thermal ablation (MITA) of liver tumors is a commonly performed procedure, alone or in combination with liver resection. Despite being a first-option strategy for small lesions, it is technically demanding, and many concerns still exist about local disease control.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing MITA from 1-2019 to 12-2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Risk factors of local recurrence were investigated through univariate and multivariable cox regression analysis.

Results: At the multivariable analysis of the 207 nodules undergoing MITA, RFA was associated with worse local Recurrence Free Survival (lRFS) than MWA (HR 2.87 [95 % CI 0.96-8.66], p = 0.05), as well as a concomitant surgical resection (HR 3.89 [95 % CI 1.06-9.77], p = 0.02). A concomitant surgical resection showed worse lRFS in the subgroup analysis of both HCC (HR 3.98 [95 % CI 1.16-13.62], p = 0.02) and CRLM patients (HR 2.68 [95 % CI 0.66-5.92], p = 0.04). Interestingly, a tumor size between 30 and 40 mm was not associated to worse lRFS.

Conclusion: MWA may reduce the risk of local recurrence in comparison to RFA, while MITA associated to liver resection may face an increased risk of local recurrence. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm such results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

local recurrence
20
risk factors
8
minimally invasive
8
invasive thermal
8
thermal ablation
8
liver tumors
8
liver resection
8
undergoing mita
8
associated worse
8
concomitant surgical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!