AI Article Synopsis

  • This study explores the national and subnational physical activity (PA) policy processes in selected Latin American countries, focusing on how these levels interact during agenda setting, formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation of policies.
  • Using the GoPA! INTEGRATE-PA-Pol tool, data was collected from policymakers in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico, finding that most respondents work in health-related sectors and report the existence of PA policies linked to noncommunicable disease prevention.
  • Results indicate a central role for subnational actors in PA promotion, but low collaboration between national and subnational policymakers across the entire policy process, highlighting a need for better engagement.

Article Abstract

Background: National physical activity (PA) policy processes are only beginning to be studied in Latin America, and little attention has focused at the subnational level. This study examined national-subnational relations in the policy process (agenda setting, policy formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation) in selected Latin American countries.

Methods: The Global Observatory for Physical Activity's (GoPA!) INTEGRATE-PA-Pol tool was applied in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico. Data were collected in matched pairs of the capital plus one noncapital city among national and subnational policymakers (n = 27), previously identified by the GoPA! Country Contacts. PA policy development and implementation were assessed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Twenty-three (response rate = 85.2%) informants provided data, mainly from the health sector (52.2%), followed by the sport (26.1%), transport (13.0%), and education (8.7%) sectors. Most informants reported that their countries had a current PA policy embedded within noncommunicable diseases prevention plans (46.2%), other plans (46.2%), or obesity prevention/management/control plans (7.7%). Respondents at the subnational level rated PA promotion as central (64.3%), while the national-level role was important but not central (75.0%). National and subnational policymakers indicated low-to-little involvement in the other level's PA policy processes across the 5 policy stages.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that collecting national and subnational PA policy data across countries with the active collaboration of the GoPA! network was feasible. We also successfully identified governmental interactions throughout the PA policy process, suggesting suboptimal engagement between national and subnational levels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0342DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

national subnational
20
policy
9
physical activity
8
subnational levels
8
colombia costa
8
costa rica
8
rica ecuador
8
ecuador mexico
8
policy processes
8
subnational level
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!