A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimization of Forward Collision Warning Algorithm Considering Truck Driver Response Behavior Characteristics. | LitMetric

Optimization of Forward Collision Warning Algorithm Considering Truck Driver Response Behavior Characteristics.

Accid Anal Prev

College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, China; The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Integrated Optimization of Road Traffic and Safety Analysis Technologies, China. Electronic address:

Published: April 2024

Forward collision warning (FCW) systems have been widely used in trucks to alert drivers of potential road situations so they can reduce the risk of crashes. Research on FCW use shows, however, that there are differences in drivers' responses to FCW alerts under different scenarios. Existing FCW algorithms do not take differences in driver response behavior into account, with the consequence that the algorithms' minimum safe distance assessments that trigger the warnings are not always appropriate for every driver or situation. To reduce false alarms, this study analyzed truck driver behavior in response to FCW warnings, and k-means clustering was adopted to classify driver response behavior into three categories: Response Before Warning (RBW), Response After Warning (RAW), and No Response (NR). Results showed that RBW clusters tend to occur at long following distances (>19 m), and drivers applied braking before the warning. In RAW clusters, deceleration after warning is significantly more forceful than before warning. NR clusters occur at short distances, and deceleration fluctuates only slightly. To optimize the FCW algorithm, the warning distance was divided into reaction distance and braking distance. The linear support vector machine was used to fit the driver reaction distance. The long short-term memory method was used to predict braking distance based on each of the three response scenarios: R was 0.896 for RAW scenarios, 0.927 for RBW scenarios, and 0.980 for NR scenarios. Verification results show that the optimized truck FCW algorithm improved safety by 1 % to 5.1 %; accuracy reached 97.92 %, and the false alarm rate was 1.73 %.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107450DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

driver response
12
response behavior
12
forward collision
8
warning
8
collision warning
8
truck driver
8
response
8
response warning
8
warning raw
8
fcw algorithm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!