The accurate selection of the recipient is a crucial aspect in the field of lung transplantation (LTX), especially if patients were previously affected by oncological disease. The aim of this bicentric retrospective study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in patients with previous oncological disease or unknown neoplasia found on native lungs submitted to LTX, compared to a control group. A total of 433 patients were included in the analysis, 31 with malignancies (Group 1) and 402 without neoplastic disease (Group 2). The two groups were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. Patients in Group 1 were older (median age 58 years vs. 50 years, = 0.039) and mostly affected by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (55% vs. 40% = 0.002). Even though in Group 1 a lower rate of late post-operative complications was found (23% vs. 45%, = 0.018), the median overall survival (OS) was lower compared to the control group (10 months vs. 29 months, = 0.015). LTX represents a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease and a history of neoplastic disease. However, every case should be carefully debated in a multidisciplinary setting, considering oncological (histology, stage, and proper disease free-interval) and clinical factors (patient's age and comorbidities). A scrupulous post-transplant follow-up is especially mandatory in those cases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854809 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030538 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!