A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Mapping the global distribution of C vegetation using observations and optimality theory. | LitMetric

Plants with the C photosynthesis pathway typically respond to climate change differently from more common C-type plants, due to their distinct anatomical and biochemical characteristics. These different responses are expected to drive changes in global C and C vegetation distributions. However, current C vegetation distribution models may not predict this response as they do not capture multiple interacting factors and often lack observational constraints. Here, we used global observations of plant photosynthetic pathways, satellite remote sensing, and photosynthetic optimality theory to produce an observation-constrained global map of C vegetation. We find that global C vegetation coverage decreased from 17.7% to 17.1% of the land surface during 2001 to 2019. This was the net result of a reduction in C natural grass cover due to elevated CO favoring C-type photosynthesis, and an increase in C crop cover, mainly from corn (maize) expansion. Using an emergent constraint approach, we estimated that C vegetation contributed 19.5% of global photosynthetic carbon assimilation, a value within the range of previous estimates (18-23%) but higher than the ensemble mean of dynamic global vegetation models (14 ± 13%; mean ± one standard deviation). Our study sheds insight on the critical and underappreciated role of C plants in the contemporary global carbon cycle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858286PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45606-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

global vegetation
12
optimality theory
8
vegetation
7
global
7
mapping global
4
global distribution
4
distribution vegetation
4
vegetation observations
4
observations optimality
4
theory plants
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!