Comparison of the stress distribution in base materials and thicknesses in composite resin restorations.

Heliyon

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Published: February 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates how different base materials and their thickness affect stress distribution in maxillary premolars restored with resin composites, focusing on the impact of polymerization shrinkage.
  • It compares a control group of sound teeth with restored teeth, with one group using composite resin alone and others using base materials like glass ionomer cement and tricalcium silicate.
  • Findings show that teeth with no base exhibited the highest stress at the tooth-restoration interface, while those with base materials experienced lower stress levels, indicating potential improvements in restoration durability.

Article Abstract

Resin-based composite materials are commonly used for restorations, but their dimensional changes during the polymerization could cause various clinical problems. This study evaluated the influence of a base of different materials and thicknesses on the stress magnitude and distribution in a second maxillary premolar with an MOD resin composite restoration using three-dimensional finite element analysis. A sound tooth without cavity was considered as the control group (ST), and another group was restored with composite resin without applying a base material in a MOD cavity (CR). The other three groups were restored with composite resin along with the following base materials: glass ionomer cement, low-viscosity resin, and tricalcium silicate, respectively (CR-GIC, CR-LR, and CR-TS). These three groups were further divided into two subgroups according to the thickness of the base layer: thin (0.5 mm) and thick (1.0 mm). The stress distribution was compared using the maximum principal stress after polymerization shrinkage and vertical loading with 600 N on the occlusal surface. Group ST showed the lowest stress value, and its stress propagation was confined to outer enamel surfaces only. Group CR demonstrated the highest stress distribution in the tooth-restoration interface with increased failure risk on marginal areas. The thin and thick subgroups of the three groups with a base layer had lower stress levels than Group CR. The base materials reduced the marginal stress caused by polymerization shrinkage of composite resin in MOD cavities. Different base materials and thicknesses did not affect the stress distribution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10850536PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

base materials
20
stress distribution
16
composite resin
16
materials thicknesses
12
three groups
12
stress
9
base
8
restored composite
8
base layer
8
polymerization shrinkage
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!