Evaluation of the Use of Highly Concentrated Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane to Improve the Outcome in the Management of Severe Dry Eye Disease, Corneal Neurotrophic Ulcer and Corneal Burn.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of highly concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) subconjunctival injections, in combination with eye drops (eye PRP, or E-PRP), in treating dry eye disease (DED) and the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane in treating corneal burns and neurotrophic ulcers for the restoration of the homeostasis of the tear film and the morphology and function of the cornea.

Methods: We studied 16 patients (n=32 eyes) with severe DED. The disease was graded as severe according to the Oxford Grading Scale. There were 12 males (75%) and four females (25%) with a mean age of 56 years; these patients were treated with monotherapy, which involved a single subconjunctival injection of 0.2-0.3 mL of PRP prepared from autologous blood, followed by application of autologous PRP eye drops four times a day for 15 days between September 2019 and December 2020 in the same geographic area. All patients gave written informed consent before undergoing the outlined treatment protocol. We evaluated best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Schirmer test score, tear film breakup time (TBUT) and corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Grading Scale) before and after six to eight weeks of treatment. Subjective normalization was defined by a decrease in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score to 10 or less, an objective normalization of the TBUT to five to six seconds, improvement in the Schirmer test score and Oxford grading and the BCVA gain of at least one line in the vision chart (Snellen chart). Furthermore, we report on the results from different variants of platelet concentrate-based treatments in five cases of corneal diseases: neurotrophic ulcers and corneal burns due to different causes (e.g., chemical burns) using E-PRP and PRF membrane with regard to normalization of morphology and function.

Results: The OSDI score decreased to normalization in 75% of the patients (p=6.545 × 10). TBUT was restored significantly in 20 of 32 eyes from 2.78±0.55 to 5.43±0.71 (p=1.612 × 10). The Schirmer test score showed an improvement from 4.46±0.67 to 10.28±1.18 (p=3.411 × 10), and BCVA improved by 43.75%, from 0.15±0.19 to 0.09±0.16 (logMAR, p=0.2331). Oxford grading changed to Scale I in 75% and Scale 0 in 25% of the patients. No complications or adverse reactions occurred in the five cases of corneal injuries. We observed a restoration of the morphology and function of the cornea with PRP injections or PRF+PRP application in 7-12 days, depending on the severity of the initial finding.

Conclusion:  PRP treatment is a new approach in ophthalmology with impressive results. Although patients show good compliance and acceptance of the treatment protocol, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm and optimize its use.