Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 10.72 million women.

BMC Womens Health

Department of Liaoning Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China.

Published: February 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Breast cancer rates among Chinese women are rising, prompting this study to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various breast cancer screening programs in China with respect to cancer detection rates and early-stage cancer detection.
  • This research involved a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies published between 2010 and 2023, using a random effects model to pool data and conduct subgroup analyses based on various factors.
  • Findings revealed that while population screening had lower overall cancer detection and early-stage detection rates compared to opportunistic screening, it showed a higher percentage of early-stage cancers, suggesting that screening methods and processes need improvement for better outcomes in China.

Article Abstract

Background: The incidence of breast cancer among Chinese women has gradually increased in recent years. This study aims to analyze the situation of breast cancer screening programs in China and compare the cancer detection rates (CDRs), early-stage cancer detection rates (ECDRs), and the proportions of early-stage cancer among different programs.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in multiple literature databases. Studies that were published between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2023 were retrieved. A random effects model was employed to pool the single group rate, and subgroup analyses were carried out based on screening model, time, process, age, population, and follow-up method.

Results: A total of 35 studies, including 47 databases, satisfied the inclusion criteria. Compared with opportunistic screening, the CDR (1.32‰, 95% CI: 1.10‰-1.56‰) and the ECDR (0.82‰, 95% CI: 0.66‰-0.99‰) were lower for population screening, but the proportion of early-stage breast cancer (80.17%, 95% CI: 71.40%-87.83%) was higher. In subgroup analysis, the CDR of population screening was higher in the urban group (2.28‰, 95% CI: 1.70‰-2.94‰), in the breast ultrasonography (BUS) in parallel with mammography (MAM) group (3.29‰, 95% CI: 2.48‰-4.21‰), and in the second screening follow-up group (2.47‰, 95% CI: 1.64‰-3.47‰), and the proportion of early-stage breast cancer was 85.70% (95% CI: 68.73%-97.29%), 88.18% (95% CI: 84.53%-91.46%), and 90.05% (95% CI: 84.07%-94.95%), respectively.

Conclusion: There were significant differences between opportunistic and population screening programs. The results of these population screening studies were influenced by the screening process, age, population, and follow-up method. In the future, China should carry out more high-quality and systematic population-based screening programs to improve screening coverage and service.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10848517PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02924-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
20
population screening
16
screening
12
screening programs
12
95%
9
cancer screening
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
cancer detection
8
detection rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!