AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) compared to patiromer in managing serum potassium levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF) from a Kuwaiti healthcare perspective.
  • A comprehensive simulation model was used to analyze the clinical outcomes and costs associated with both treatments over a lifetime horizon, using data from significant clinical trials and local hospital costs.
  • Results indicate that SZC is generally a cost-saving treatment option for managing hyperkalemia, with potential savings ranging from KWD -60 to KWD -1,235, suggesting it should be considered as a viable treatment for CKD/HF patients in Kuwait.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Our model was conducted from Kuwaiti payer's perspective to provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) versus patiromer to correct and maintain serum potassium (K+) in combination with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) with different dose titration in patients with chronic kidney disease/heart failure (CKD/HF) with/without renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Methodology: The model was developed as a patient-level, fixed-time increment stochastic simulation to simulate the complexity of disease, including multiple coexisting and competing conditional risks. This model was established to compare SZC versus patiromer as a treatment for hyperkalemia (HK) among adult populations with underlying conditions of advanced CKD stages 3a-5 or HF to correct and maintain serum K + over a lifetime horizon. The clinical outcomes of SZC and patiromer were demonstrated through arm-specific K + trajectories extracted from the HARMONIZE trial and OPAL-HK trial, respectively. The utility data was captured from different studies. Direct medical cost was captured from local data from Kuwaiti hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty in the model.

Results: Within different scenarios of CKD/HF, SZC was a cost-saving option, with/without RRT, whether one-off administration or repeated administration, except for one-off treatment administration among the HF cohort, which generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of KWD 331/quality adjusted life year (QALY). The incremental QALY of SZC ranged from 0.007 to 0.202. In addition, the savings observed with SZC fall within a range of KWD -60 to KWD -1,235 at serum K+ ≥ 5.1 mmol/L.

Conclusion: The evidence generated by our model recommends the inclusion of SZC as a treatment option to correct HK and maintain normal serum K + level for CKD/HF patients within the Kuwaiti healthcare system. The costs saved from reducing frequent HK episodes, RAASis discontinuation/down titration, major cardiovascular events, and hospitalization offset the drug acquisition cost of SZC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2314930DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

correct maintain
12
sodium zirconium
8
zirconium cyclosilicate
8
patients chronic
8
chronic kidney
8
szc
8
szc versus
8
versus patiromer
8
maintain serum
8
cost-effectiveness analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!