Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Totally implantable central venous access ports, are required for various purposes, ranging from chemotherapy to nutrition. Port infection is a common complication. In many patients with port infection, the ports are removed because antibiotics are ineffective. We evaluated the risk factors associated with port removal due to port infection.
Methods: By retrospective chart review, we collected data of 223 patients who underwent port removal for any reason. Port infection was defined as infection symptoms, such as fever; elevated white blood cell counts or C-reactive protein levels; or redness at the port site, in the absence of other infections, which improved with port removal. The characteristics of patients with or without port infection were compared using univariate (chi-squared test, -test) and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results: We compared 172 patients without port infection to 51 patients with port infection. Univariate analysis identified sex ( = 0.01), body mass index (BMI) ⩽20 kg/m ( = 0.00004), diabetes mellitus ( = 0.04), and purpose of use ( = 0.0000003) as significant variables. However, male sex ( = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.23), BMI ⩽20 kg m ( = 0.002, 95% CI: 0.06-0.29), and purpose of use (total parenteral nutrition (TPN); = 0.000005, 95% CI: 0.31-0.76) remained significant using multivariate analysis. Moreover, the patients with short bowel syndrome and difficulty in oral intake tended to be infected easily. Additionally, Staphylococcus species were the most common microbes involved in port infection.
Conclusions: Male sex, BMI ⩽20 kg/m, and purpose of use as a TPN were risk factors for port infection. Ports should not be used for long duration of TPN or used only in exceptional cases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11297298231225808 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!