Introduction: The proponents of local route of Dexamethasone (DXM) administration for impacted mandibular 3rd molar (MM3) surgeries claim advantages over the traditional systemic routes. This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to determine whether the route of perioperative administration of DXM influences the inflammatory outcomes of MM3 surgeries.

Methodology: An electronic database search over a 25 year period of randomised trials of DXM in MM3 surgeries was conducted. The mean differences or standardised mean differences were extracted and pooled using the fixed or random-effects model.

Results: Of the sixteen selected trials, four were considered for a meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in the inflammatory outcomes between the local and systemic routes of DXM.

Conclusion: The claimed advantages of the local route of DXM do not appear to be scientifically valid. Clinical trials supported with DXM plasma measurements are needed to confirm the absence of a systemic effect when DXM is administered locally.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831005PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-02011-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

local route
16
impacted mandibular
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
claimed advantages
8
advantages local
8
mm3 surgeries
8
systemic routes
8
inflammatory outcomes
8
dxm
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!